Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Donald Trump, and Sarah Palin

February 3, 2016 in Politics

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

The media is telling us that Marco Rubio is so Reaganesque, but Ronald Reagan wasn't a liar like Marco Rubio

Marco Rubio is Showing Us the Kind of Man He Really Is

It is now two days after the Republican Presidential Caucus in Iowa, in which Ted Cruz was the decisive winner and Donald Trump placed second with Marco Rubio placed third. According to Fox News, however, Marco Rubio was the winner somehow, because they seemingly have adopted being Marco Rubio’s campaign headquarters. The election night coverage was heavily slanted toward Marco Rubio and praising him, and the coverage has not changed since. As with Marco Rubio, Fox News has now focused their campaign sharply on bashing Ted Cruz, and not on the issues, either, just like Rubio. Those of us who follow politics know that during the Senate’s Gang of 8 battle, Ted Cruz was firmly on the side of not passing Barack Obama’s Comprehensive Immigration Reform, which was an amnesty bill that made illegal immigration permanently a pathway to citizenship for the future. Marco Rubio, however, was one of the authors of the bill, was a firm supporter, and had completely gone in a direction 180 degrees the opposite of the position he ran on to become a U.S. Senator. As a resident of Florida, the betrayal that Marco Rubi laid on us was unforgiveable, and it was something that I planned to remember, hawing that he was eyeing the White House ever since he started his first day in the Senate. Simply put, Marco Rubio was and still is Mr. Amnesty, and voted right along with 100% of the Democrat Party. Every single Democrat voted for the bill, and half of the Gang of 8 were RINOs who were supporting the interests of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, who wanted cheap labor.

I remember the amendment that Ted Cruz proposed, and it was clear at the time that he put in an amendment to poison the bill and make obvious what the intentions were behind the bill. The amendment called for all the legalized immigrants to never receive citizenship and never receive the right to vote. The amendment failed, showing that the proponents, like Marco Rubio were not interested in legalizing people and rescuing them from “the shadows.” It was all about getting voters for the Democrats and it was all about getting cheap labor for the Republicans. They still held firm even though the immigrants would still be able to work, because they knew that their Democrat allies wanted citizen voters. Now that he is running for President, as expected, Marco Rubio is seemingly arguing that Ted Cruz was just as pro-amnesty as him. Not only is this a lie, it seems like a crappy argument since he’s really seeing, “Hey, Ted Cruz is just as bad as me, so you might as well vote for me!”

Fox News has been praising Marco Rubio since his third place finish as if he did so much better than expected. He actually placed just where the polls predicted him to place. He may have been a little closer to second place, but that’s no big deal. Fox News even lied in their reporting, saying that Marco Rubio had done so well spending very little time there and spending so little money. In reality, Marco Rubio spent $11 million on the Iowa campaign. Ted Cruz spent $7 million, and Donald Trump spent $3 million. Marco Rubio spent more than Ted Cruz and Donald Trump combined! I heard the report on the Mark Levin Show on Tuesday, February 2nd. In this episode, Mark does site the original source. I am not taking the time to listen through and find it right now.

Ben Carson – The Devout Christian Who is a Deceitful Liar


Here’s the link.

The biggest controversy right now is how the Ted Cruz campaign supposedly engaged in an evil move to deceive Ben Caron’s voters. this is simply not true. In fact, most of the reports about this issue do not include the actual audio or video from the initial CNN report that implied that Ben Carson was suspending his campaign, and nor do they show the quote form the actual tweet from the Cruz campaign staffer who never said that Ben Carson was dropping out. Here is the initial CNN report. It is amazing how the people at Fox News don’t seem to be able to find it on YouTube, like the rest of us can.

So, e member of Ted Cruz’s campaign staff tweeted out that Ben Carson was leaving the trail for a week and wasn’t going to do New Hampshire. At no time did the tweet mention that Carson was suspending his campaign. The Cruz campaign did not lie to anyone, but just pointed out that it looked weird that Carson was leaving the trail for a week, when the next primary was on the following week and this week was the last one to campaign. Who supplied the news about Carson returning home to CNN? It was Ben Carson’s campaign that told them. Instead of being mad at CNN, Ben Carson is mad at Ted Cruz and is bashing him, saying that Cruz was lying to Carson supporters to get their votes. Fox News is more than happy to carry this story and has been supposedly spending all day on it. Apparently Ben Carson didn’t need too much rest and relaxation from the trail, because he has been campaigning on Fox News by bashing Ted Cruz. At this pint, Carson knows that his numbers are too low in all the upcoming states for him to make a surge. He is just playing the roll of spoiler for the chances of another Conservative. Ben Carson obviously knows that the source of the story was CNN and that Cruz’s campaign did not lie, but passed the news along with he same question mark at the end as the CNN report. In other words, Ben Carson is practicing deception and Ben Carson is lying by omission. How Christian of him.

Marco Rubio’s campaign also passed along the same news as Cruz’s campaign to staffers. Yet, we’re not hearing any complaints or even a mention of it from Fox News, because Rubio’s their horse in the race for the RINO Establishment. Ben Carson’s result came to exactly where the polls had him. There wasn’t any sudden shift of thousands of votes to Cruz from the Carson campaign. Cruz ended up with over 50,000 and Carson ended up with less than a third of that.

Enter the Soar Loser, Donald Trump

Donald trump is a soar loser and apparently doesn't know how to lsoe like a mn.

No Republican Presidential Primary Campaign news can exist without the reality TV star, Donald Trump’s face and tweets in it. Donald Trump has been going on just about every form of media that exists bashing Ted Cruz, saying that it was a fraudulent election and that the election should be held again. He also is kissing Ben Carson’s butt with kind remarks. What’s funny is that Ben Carson was doing well in Iowa back in November, 2015, until the same Donald Trump started personal attacks on Carson. Carson’s campaign never recovered from these attacks. Since then, Carson has been polling in fourth instead of first or second. Carson ended up placing fourth with the same percentage of support that he was getting in the polls. There was no fraud and there were no bogus results based on a tweet. As usual, Donald Trump is lying his ass off and threatening to sue. Go ahead Donald, sue. Let’s see how far your lawsuit goes. Donald Trump won’t sue, because he knows it would get thrown out and he doesn’t want to embarrass himself anymore than he already does.

Sarah Palin – Donald Trump’s New Attack Dog

Sarah Palin is very comfortable selling out conservatism to become a Trump attack dog

Many of us Conservatives got a bad taste in our mouths when Sarah Palin rushed to support Donald Trump while he was praising chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid as great people that he had great relationships with and would be able to make deals with. In fact, while Sarah Palin had always been a proponent of removing taxpayer subsidies for big ethanol, she aligned with Trump and changed her stance on that issue right before the Iowa primaries. Since then, she has been putting off a hell of a lot of Conservatives with her Ted Cruz bashing. She’s been entering into personal attacks reminiscent of the left wing media’s personal attacks on her throughout the years. In this latest Trump bashing move, she has been calling Ted Cruz every name in the book and accusing him of deception and lying. Sarah, perhaps you should take a look at the reality TV star that you are supporting and fighting for. Maybe you should also acquaint yourself with the facts.

Not all Conservatives are Ted Cruz supporters, but just about all Conservatives have a great respect for him. We also have long memories. Sarah Palin is going to have a really hard time recovering her former Conservative credibility from this. It’s not only just the decision to support Donald Trump, which could eventually be put down to going with the flow or being deceived by his charisma, but now, she’s attacking with her claws out just like a leftist. She’s also going very personal too and is not sticking to the issues. I remember liking her for agreeing with her positions, but always had to cringe a bit when she spoke, because she never came across as been well-informed or well-spoken. So, for me, it is not a big loss to lose her as a Conservative voice. Yet, I would like to remind Sarah that now that she’s Donald Trump’s attack dog that there is a term for female dogs. She’s now Donald Trump’s _____.

In this Republican Presidential Primary season, we are really getting to know some people better.

Donald Trump – Poor Baby Continues to Cry “Unfair!”

January 27, 2016 in General, Politics

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

Donald Trump says that Fox News is "unfair to him." Poor baby! Welcome to being a Republican!

Donald Trump is Staying Out of the Fox News Debate Before the Iowa Primaries, Because “they have been unfair to him.”

All day today, people have been speculating on why Donald Trump is holding out of participating in the Fox News debate before the Iowa Caucuses. Donald Trump says that he is not going to participate, because Fox News did not agree to his demands to have Megan Kelly removed as the moderator, because she had been unfair to him in the last Fox News debate. I know that Donald Trump has been a liberal Democrat right up until he has been toying with the idea of running for President, so maybe he is unaware of what it is like to be a Republican. If you are a Republican, you have to participate in debates and deal with the media that is always going to be tough on you and try to trip you up. Of course, Trump has been crying “unfair” for a while now, and he still doesn’t seem to have figured it out yet. Yet, this has not hurt Donald Trump thus far, because he has a locked-in set of drone followers that I call Trump Chumps. They look at this act on Donald Trump’s part as standing up to the media. I don’t think so. Ted Cruz has also received rough treatment from the media, but he soldiers on and argues back. Trump seems to be saying that the media is being unfair and he’s not going to play anymore.

What is Trump Scared Of?

Trump worshippers will, of course, say that he is not afraid of anything, but his move is really a defensive action. He feels that he is leading and could only lose votes if he shows up. In the last debate, Ted Cruz knocked him a few times in refuting his whole Birther argument, and for once, Trump looked shaky and desperate. With Trump arguing lately about how he would be better than Cruz because he can make deals with the establishment and that he has great relationships with Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Chuck Schumer, he certainly does not want to defend these positions against Ted Cruz, because Trump’s worshippers think of him as an “outsider.” There is a reason why Trump has great relationships with Nancy Pelosi, harry Reid, and Chuck Schumer, it’s because he gave them lots of money for their campaigns! Donald knows that his followers don’t want to have to see him flail around defending that. Donald Trump knows that if he doesn’t show up, his followers won’t watch. Then afterwards, he’ll say that they had low ratings because he, the he, the grand celebrity, wasn’t there.

There is still a possibility that Trump will show up to try and get a spotlight, but I doubt it. He doesn’t want to face Cruz. Ted Cruz threw down the gauntlet and challenged Trump to a one on one debate with a moderator of Trump’s choice or no moderator at all. Donald Trump won’t take up the challenge though. he’ll act like it is beneath him, but really, he knows he wouldn’t have a chance against Cruz one on one. Mark Levin, offered to host the debate on his show and promised to only moderate as far as commercial breaks were concerned. In the past, to get some Mark Levin listeners to follow him, Trump said that he was an avid listener to the Mark Levin Show. So, Trump has no excuse for not taking up the challenge.

Trump Can do no Wrong According to the Trump Chumps

Thanks to these morons who blindly follow Donald Trump because of his first speech and who ignore everything since then in Trump’s RINO/liberal positions, we may end up having this baby with a megaphone as President. Just like the dummy drones who followed Obama, these idiots won’t be able to admit it afterward that they were responsible for blindly following a cult leader, but they will most certainly regret it when they find out what life would like under a President who has no set principles except for his own fascination with himself and tyrannical tendencies that lead him to try to destroy anyone who doesn’t follow along like a sheep.

Don’t be a Chump and Vote for Donald Trump

January 23, 2016 in General, Politics

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

Don't be a Chump for Donald Trump

The Chumps Who are Rallying Behind Trump are in for a Rude Awakening

Excuse the cheesey slogan. It’s just a play on words with the Trump slogan, “Don’t be a chump, vote for Trump.” Yep, it’s a stereotypical political campaign slogan. It’s almost as unimaginative as stealing “Make America Great Again” from Ronald Reagan. The difference is that Ronald Reagan was a great president, and Donald Trump winning the Republican nomination would be a disaster. It would bring us back to having to choose between a left-wing Marxist and a crony capitalist RINO. We would have to vote for the lesser of two evils as usual, but in this case, we’d have to stomach voting for a RINO who is also an asshole with tyrannical tendencies. Right now, I know a lot of the people who fell for his first selling pints hook line and sinker are raving mad, and that is because you are putting your faith totally in a person and not principles. You will defend him to the hilt no matter how far to the left and how hypocritical he reveals himself to be. I am deeply concerned because I don’t know if I could bring myself to vote for this asshole with tyrannical tendencies. It’s tough, because we know that on the Democrat side, as usual, it will end up being a left-wing Marxist whether Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders gets the nomination. Hillary is a Mercedes Marxist and Bernie is a VW bus Marxist. Both would bring this country into the third world category as our economy continues to sink, part-time jobs are the only ones available, health care continues to become even more unaffordable, and the leftist cronies become richer and richer as the overwhelming majority of the population becomes poorer and poorer. Still, I believe that Donald Trump would also be a complete disaster for this country. He will not make America great again, he will just attempt to crush anyone who does not tow the line and say that he has made America great again.

Conservatives Should Have no Faith in Donald Trump

I am only attempting to speak to those who plan to vote in the Republican primaries, especially Conservatives. We don’t want to put ourselves into the position of having to vote for the lesser of two evils once again, as has been the case. Many of us fell for Donald Trump right away when he made his first speech and took a firm stance on immigration, the second amendment, military funding, and trade. Many of us liked what we heard, but too many of us were impatient and started getting to wrapped up in just focusing on this man and just believing his inspiring speeches without reservation and research. I held back and did not comment on him too much, other than saying that Jeb Bush’s attacks and the other attacks from the mainstream media and the Republican establishment were ridiculous. Jeb Bush is a RINO and always haws been. He doesn’t have much credit to declare that Donald Trump is not a true Conservative, neither do the other RINOs.

Now, however, we see RINOs starting to line up behind Donald Trump and there is a good reason why. I will get to that in a moment. Another reason why many of us got behind Trump so quickly was that we saw that he weathered the storm of the mainstream media’s attacks on his stance on illegal immigration. Yet, truth be told, when true Conservatives like Ted Cruz and Ben Carson held their stances, it didn’t come across to a lot of people as it being impressive. Why? They held strong just the same as Trump. In fact, Ted Cruz has always been a Conservative, not so with Donald Trump (not be a long shot). It just didn’t trigger as much passion in people because there wasn’t as much of a media-driven hype about it. The media would just bash Conservatives, and the Conservatives would stand fast, and that would be it. The Trump vs. media fight was all over the news every single day and was super-hyped, so people got more passionate about it.

So these two elements, the first speech and then the battle with the media were the hook. Too many Conservatives got locked into being Trump cheerleaders and have now closed their minds to what’s going on. And now, plenty of you folks out there have the hook caught in your mouth. My suggestion is that you take the hook out and wake up, because you’ve been baited and here comes the switch.

Why the RINOs are Flocking to Trump

Donald Trump, quite proudly, announced this week how now everyone in the establishment is flocking to his side. He spent about 40 seconds bragging about it before he stated that he maybe shouldn’t have said that. this was on Wednesday at a campaign rally. The audio was played on the Sean Hannity and Mark Levin radio shows. Bob Dole, and a good number of other well-established RINOs also came out and said that they would much prefer Donald Trump to Ted Cruz, because they feel that they could work with Trump and not with Cruz. Donald Trump also, in his regular bashing of true Conservative, Ted Cruz, constantly says that everyone hates Ted Cruz because he doesn’t make deals, and the he, Donald Trump would make deals. After all, he is the one who had ghost writers write Art of the Deal for him. Remember, that’s the book that Donald Trump says comes in second place only to the Bible? Yeah, that Bible he started carrying around and mentioning for the first time in his life when he started running in the Republican primary and going to early primary states like Iowa. Now, Trump is sounding and acting m ore like the guy who, in 2014 gave a $30,000 donation to Mitch McConnell’s super-PAC for defeating Conservatives in te Republican primaries across the country. At least that donation was to a Republican. Now, when asked about his numerous and very large contributions to campaigns for Democrats like Harry Reid, Nancy Pilosi, and Hillary Clinton, Trump remarks that he donated to campaigns of both parties because he had to do further his business.

It doesn’t matter whether you believe Donald Trump’s explanation for donating huge sums of money to left-wing Democrats (some of whom were outside of his district of living and business operations by the way – meaning that they had no influence over his business), because both possible explanations are BAD. If Trump is lying, and really donated funds to liberal Democrats because he wanted to support them, then he best explain why we should believe some of his supposed stances that he took that were Conservative and in direct opposition to these candidates’ politics. If, on the other hand, t=he is telling the truth and he didn’t donate money to far left Democrats because he supported them, but because he wanted to further his business, then it means that he was engaging in a quid pro quo, which is ILLEGAL. If politicians engage in exchanging beneficial policies for campaign contributions is a crime. Now many would say, “Yeah, but it happens all the time, they just hide it.” Fine, so do you want it to continue? Trump says that this is one of the biggest problems in Washington, and that he can’t be bought because he’s a billionaire. So, we can only trust billionaires? So only billionaires can be President? So, it is ok for Donald Trump to engage in this kind of criminal activity when it benefits him, but he’s going to clean it up now that he got away with it?

We deserve better than this.

How Donald Trump Might Disappoint Those Who Believe he will Fix Illegal Immigration

So now that RINOs are flocking to Donald Trump, as he boasts, do you think that these members of the establishment have all of a sudden changed their position on open borders and illegal immigration? Don’t think so! Do you remember Trump’s speeches when he talked about building his great wall? Don’t you remember the bit about the “big huge door in the wall?,” as he calls it? He wants immigration, but he wants it to be legal immigration. True enough, most of us Conservatives only have a problem with those who come to this country illegally, but we do not have a problem with those who come legally… but… The thing that Donald Trump has been perpetually silent about is the real question. What will be his system of legal immigration? Well, all that he tells us is that there will be a “big huge door.” Obviously this is a metaphor and there is no plan for a physical door that is huge. yet, the metaphor seems to indicate that the legal process won’t be all that restrictive. In other words, Trump offers no insurance on having immigration policies that allows for worker visas and guest worker visas based on the country’s needs and economic conditions. What’s just as important as border security is to have quotas for visas based on job availability in different positions of employment. Will Trump’s big huge door allow the RINOs and the Chamber of Commerce members to continue to bring in floods of legal immigrant workers who work for less than American workers and drive us out of the job market?

How about the Democrat angle. If you pay attention to Trump’s speeches, you will notice that he is a firm supporter for social security, Medicare, and Medicaid AS THEY ARE AND WITHOUT REFORM. He just says we’ll be able to fund them despite all of the new spending that he proposes based on working out trade imbalances. Well, we have over $200 trillion in unpaid liabilities in these programs and his trade numbers are nowhere even close to covering these shortfalls. So, how about the Democrat angle, of having floods of immigrants coming in and going straight onto the welfare rolls? Trump makes no mention about how much legal immigration he will allow, other than saying that there will be a BIG HUGE DOOR.

Don’t be a chump. The RINO Republican Establishment is flocking to Trump now because he has sent the signals, and has, perhaps, done some phone calls behind the scenes in making sure people know that they will get what they want if they support him. He can build a big wall like he promised, and maybe even get Mexico to supposedly pay for it by arranging better trade deals with Mexico, but you can bet that in his artistic deal making, the RINO supporters will get exactly what they want. Remember, even less than two years ago Donald Trump was funding the campaigns of those who were open borders, amnesty candidates. We had an immigration problem then too, but Donald Trump was funding the OTHER SIDE.

How Donald Trump is BOUGHT AND PAID FOR

Probably the bi9ggest argument that the Trump Chumps make about supporting him is that he will “ge rid of all the lobbyists and he can’t be bought because he has tons of money.” So then, why did he just promise to the ethanol lobby that he is going to set EPA standards for ethanol in fuel higher than both Barak Obama and George W. Bush? Why is he quite openly in his speeches in Iowa bragging that he is going to heavily subsidize (from the American taxpayer’s wallet) the ethanol industry? Because he wants to win Iowa. A lot of corn, used for ethanol is grown there. We are already, through our tax dollars, heavily subsidizing corn production in Iowa because the ethanol industry would not be able to stay alive if they didn’t force gas companies to use it in their gasoline and force us taxpayers to fund them. Ethanol is not a popular additive for fuel because it corrodes engines and takes so much energy to make that the energy that you get out of it is very little. In other words, you have to use a lot of fossil fuel energy in order to convert corn into ethanol, and the amount of ethanol you get out of it is little for how much energy you put into it. Three gallons of ethanol would enough energy to get 4 gallons produced. That doesn’t include the cost of time. So, basically, it isn’t cost effective. The environmentalists who started this whole thing being forced on us by the EPA are even coming off the idea now because of how much energy and money it wastes, but politicians, RINOs and bought off Democrats still fund the ethanol industry because of the ethanol lobby’s pressure on them.

Donald Trump is going to force us as taxpayer to pay even more at the pump and in our taxes to fund this industry that can’t stand on its own merit in the free market, because he wants to win Iowa. Here we are at the first state in the primary and Donald Trump has already sold out to lobbyists at OUR EXPENSE. Donald Trump doesn’t need to be bought off by money, he can be bought off in other ways. Trump rewards those who support him or tow the line for him and punishes those who don’t. As a President, Donald Trump will reward those who kiss his lying ass and punish those who don’t. Maybe that’s why you Trump Chumps are already puckering up.

Donald Trump’s Lies and Tyrannical nature

Do you remember Trump’s glorious campaign announcement when the magic all began? Do you remember that story he kept telling in his first few speeches about the hypothetical phone conversations between him and an auto company that was moving their plant to Mexico? Do you remember how Trump said that he would handle that? He quite clearly, and on many occasions said that he would get the company to keep their plant in the U.S. by threatening to put a 30% tax on their car sales. Hmmm… seems to me that Constitutionally-speaking, the President does not have the power to just put a tax on one company to punish it. In fact, the President is in the executive branch and can’t make laws or any rules out of the blue like that. All regulations made by executive branch agencies must be base don existing laws passed by CONGRESS. So, does Trump mean that he just might fire off unconstitutional executive order like Barack Obama? Does Trump mean that he will just take such power even though he doesn’t have it, or would he just try to bully congress into punishing one company like that. In any scenario, it sounds to me like Donald Trump has been accustomed to getting his way by threatening and bullying people he doesn’t agree with. It would be one thing if he were to propose a policy he would put before congress about companies that ship jobs overseas, kind of like how Barack Obama’s been doing, all the time it isn’t working, now is it? Either way, this tyrannical bully attitude is a big red flag that should have Conservatives very worried. Of course, many of us also have knowledge about the damage that too many tariffs and trade wars can do to the economy. The issue is more complex than Donald Trump makes it out to be. Maybe Trum0 has been spending too much time in TV land.

Since then, Donald Trump has been making a lot of promises in which he’s just going to be the bully in chief and get things done that way. Trouble is, he doesn’t speak in terms of policy or HOW it will be done, just that he’s going to kick ass and do it. Many of us started to really worry when we heard this kick ass attitude come out in attacks on Ben Carson and Ted Cruz. Instead of debating with Carson or Cruz on policy, Trump just jumps in like a schoolyard bully and starts bashing through personal attacks. Trump said that Caron has a pathological anger problem that could never be cured, just like a pedophile could never be cured, just like a pedophile could never be cured. Basically, trump redefined the word “pathology.” Ben Carson has clearly overcome the anger of his youth and has a spotless record of domestic peace and happiness to prove it. Now Trump is going after Cruz, using a birther argument that only left-wing lawyers who don’t believe in the Constitution support. Not a single Conservative or Constitutional originalism lawyer doubts that a child of a U.S. citizen born abroad is a U.S. citizen. Most countries don’t even have birthright citizenship for simply being born in the country. Only we have that in our anchor baby policy. Remember that Donald? In other words, if Americans travel abroad, it would be a damn shame if their children would be a citizen of no country, because our own country doesn’t allow you to have a baby when you are outside the country. Here, we see through a window into Trump’s stupid, hate-filled mind with these attacks. How did the birther argument go with Barack Obama when you tried that stunt, Donald? I seem to remember that you ended up looking like a fool when he produced his birth certificate! Trouble is, Trump made Conservatives look worse, because then people started saying that Conservative don’t like Obama because they think he’s from another country and are conspiracy idiots. Thanks Donald!

Trump is also bashing Cruz, saying that somehow his taking out a loan from a bank to fund his campaign was criminal and was worse than what Hillary Clinton did. Actually, Ted Cruz took out a loan for his Senate campaign, because he isn’t a billionaire like Trump, and then he paid it back. He reported it on a public filing, but put it on the wrong form. This is called a mistake, and is not criminal activity you dumb ass! Trump says that this is worse than Hillary Clinton? Not only is Trump a liar, a bully, and an asshole, he’s a threat to seeing Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders defeated in 2016! Trump is bashing Republicans more than he is bashing Democrats. He’s making his “own party” out to be worse than the Democrats!

Please don’t make us choose between two Marxists and a half Democrat/RINO asshole with tyrannical tendencies people. Donald Trump cannot win the primaries, or this country is going down the toilet and goodbye American dream.

It’s About Time for People to Tell the Democrat Party that their Hate and Lies are Unacceptable

October 12, 2015 in Politics, Spirituality

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz Reminds Us How Full of Hate and Lies the Democrat Party Is

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is the perfect Democrat as she is full of hate and lies.

With the first Democrat Presidential Primary debate coming up, the mainstream media decided to go out and give a forum to the head of the Democrat Party (DNC.), to get her “thoughts” about this wonderful upcoming event. Wasserman-Schultz basically began playing the same old broken record that she usually plays and that most Democrat politicians play. She just set out to bash the Republicans, calling them the party and its supporters are anti-woman, want to kick out all immigrants, and want to steal from the middle class and give to the rich. Not only is this broken record full of lies, but it is so full of hate that it is about time that people just start rejecting these claims and call for some actual substance, rather than blanket hate-filled accusations.

There is Such a thing as Legal Immigration

Every time you hear a Democrat engage in his or her propaganda, you will never hear them make any distinction between legal and illegal immigration. They always just use the term “immigration.” The reason is quite clear. While many Republicans and especially the Conservative portion of the Republican Party want to clamp down on illegal immigration SPECUFUCALLY, Democrats do not want to let the argument stand as it is. They strive to re-define the argument as being anti-immigration period and anti-Latino. Well beyond just Republicans, poll after poll show that the American people, including all ethnicities support legal immigration over illegal immigration. As a country, the United States cannot survive if illegal immigrants are allowed to come to the country, take jobs from legal immigrants and Americans of all ethnicities or take government benefits from taxpaying citizens of all ethnicities. The whole point of legal immigration is to measure the amount of people coming into the country, try to explore their backgrounds for criminality, try to monitor their behavior provisionally to make sure that they don’t turn to crime or take advantage of the system, and seek out those legal immigrants that can be contributors to society, rather than takers from society. Perhaps Latinos should be louder in stating that they are perfectly capable of following a legal process for immigration or are ALREADY U.S. citizens (going back many generations in some cases) and that they don’t want to be defined as simply a category that only cares about providing rewards and benefits on their own dime for people coming here illegally, even if they are Latinos. Latin America is a huge region of the world, and note to Democrats, they are not all the same!

as the national debt goes well beyond $18 trillion, on schedule to double in its amount since Barack Obama took office, the Democrat Party still wants to bleed the American taxpayer to pay for rewards for those who came here illegally and get these paid-for potential voters legalized and ready to vote. Hell, in many Democrat-run states and precincts, there are huge numbers of illegal immigrants already voting for Democrats to continue funding them with taxpayer money. On the Republican side, there is a large amount of RINOs in the Republican Establishment who want to serve their donors in the he U.S. Chamber of Commerce by bringing in as many illegal immigrants as possible to work for very low wages to fatten the wallets of their corporatist members. Far from the leis of the Democrat Party, people who want the problem of illegal immigration to be dealt with are actually being quite reasonable.

The Phony War on Women

Oh yeah, Republicans and Conservatives hate women. Even the half of them that ARE women. Sure Debbie. the whole War on Women mantra began in 2012 as a propaganda effort to maintain a Democrat Party’s claim on the majority of the female vote. Essentially, Barack Obama decided, after the fact, that he was going to add free birth control and abortions to Obamacare, even though he cannot Constitutionally change a law by himself. As one can assume, many religious organizations objected because they don’t believe in either birth control or abortion, or both. They simply didn’t want to have to pay for it. Now apart from the common sense concept that people should be responsible for buying their own birth control or abortions, the Democrat Party lied and sold the Republican and Conservative concerns as wanting to ban birth control, even though there was no one arguing for that at all. The Democrats, when pressed on this inevitably said that some women cannot afford birth control or abortions, and thus, these things should be funded by all of society as an essential human right. the Democrats made it their main, if not only thrust of supporting “Women’s Health Care.” Funny how the leading cause of death in women is heart disease and then a variety of cancers after that, kind of like the leading causes of death for men too, the Democrat Party decided that free birth control and abortions are THE ISSUE in women’s health. If one looked at it rationally, one would say that the Democrat Party thought sex without having a baby was the primary need of women in the U.S. I guess the needs of pre-adolescent girls and post-menopausal women were not even considered. I thought that it was not enlightened to think of women as primarily sexual beings.

In any case, Barack Obama got his majority of the female vote, and gone can ask whether or not women felt that it was well worth it because they now get free birth control pills and abortions. the truth is, under-privileged women already had plenty of programs and organizations that saw to providing free condoms, very inexpensive birth control pills, and yes, free abortions if needed. Now, people get to decide if Obamacare, a.k.a. “The Affordable Care Act,” has really made their healthcare more affordable. In the overwhelming majority of cases for men and women, it has just made their premiums and deductibles skyrocket. Where the hell is all this money going? Are you really receiving all these wonderful benefits that Barack Obama and the Democrat Party promised?

I will leave the debate on the morality of abortion, not just religiously, but humanitarianly aside for now, because it was never at stake in the “War on Women” in the first place. One can still wonder, though, why the hell is it that when Democrats talk about women’s health, their main thing is talking about sex and killing off unwanted babies, half of which are actually female.

The Democrat War on the Middle Class

Well, if the Democrat Party wants to talk about the middle class and what they’ve done to us, then we have plenty to say. thank you, Democrats, for making our health care far more unaffordable with the Affordable Care Act. My insurance premiums, as a teacher working two part-time positions, have seen my premiums double since the passage of Obamacare. My policy hardly covers anything as well. The median household for the middle class has gone down under Barack Obama by 10%, 93 million (about 1/3) of working age adults are not working (and not counted as “unemployed” unless currently looking for work), and about 50 million Americans (1/6 of the population) are on food stamps. As the Democrats continue to call free market capitalism as trickle-down economics, we see the reality of their trickle-up poverty striking the middle class hard. By the way, I earn less than $30,000.00 a year, doesn’t that count as being a member of the lower middle class? Aren’t I a little guy? It’s about time that Americans see the Democrat Party’s socialism as what it really is, punishment for the middle class and promotion of government dependency as a method for owning us and our votes. They want to make sure those votes come in, in return for maintaining dependency or perpetual financial suffering. If more and more of the middle class were able to be self-sufficient, the less they would need the Democrat Party’s promises of help. The Democrat Party wants people to stay exactly where they are, IN NEED.

The last time the Democrats rolled out their plans for “taxing the rich,” they nailed all of us with doubling the payroll tax, January, 2013. As our tax burden grows and our health care expenses skyrocket, Americans have to really ask themselves how this helps us in the middle class. Who really is punishing the middle class?

Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is the perfect Democrat, full of lies, hate, accusations, and the desire to bring the middle class down to its knees.

Kevin McCarthy Would be Just Another Jon Boehner as Speaker of the House

September 30, 2015 in Politics

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

Kevin McCarthy is Said to be the Leader in Getting Support for Speaker of the House

Politically speaking, Kevein McCarthy is Jon Boehner, Jr.

Most people who follow politics know by now that Jon Boehner announced his resignation at the end of last week and plans to resign his position as a U.S. Representative as well after October30. Boehner’s days were looking numbered for a while now, as the Republican base, true Conservatives, are fed up with him pushing the Obama agenda and lying to his constituents about fighting against Obamacare, fighting against executive (un-constitutional) amnesty, trying to reduce government spending, and all of the other things that Republicans have been promising to fight for. In the landslide elections of 2010 and 2014 that put Republicans in control of the House of Representatives and the Senate, respectively, Republican victories were achieved by an active and informed conservative base, many of which are labeled as “The Tea Party,” whether they choose to accept this categorical name or not. Since taking the gavel in January of 2011, Jon Boehner has been nothing less than either a cheerleader for Barack Obama’s far left agenda or at least a willing pushover. Boehner has worked hard in the House of Representatives to punish true Republicans by removing them from committees and by funding the campaigns of their opponents. When the Republican in Name Only Majority leader, Eric Cantor, was defeated in the 2014 Republican primary by Dave Brat, a true Conservative, Jon Boehner got his fellow RINO, Kevin McCarthy, in the position. Since then, Kevin McCarthy has just been a servant for pushing Jon Boehner’s weak responses and overall support for Barack Obama’s agenda. In announcing his resignation, Jon Boehner all but endorsed Kevin McCarthy to take his position.

Kevin McCarthy is Just Jon Boehner, Jr.

In addition tot he fact that Jon Boehner has helped Kevin McCarthy rise to the ranks, Boehner even puts his name forward as being a good replacement for him, and furthermore, he mentioned no other names. Jon Boehner was pushed to the max in his most recent primary election campaign by a virtually unknown Republican candidate. He knows darn well that he will not be re-elected as he has only progressively got worse in the meantime as far as exhibiting fake resistance against the Obama agenda and all out support for it. Passing Obama trade and the biggest spending bill in our nation’s history are just two examples of his all out support and meaningless statement votes about disagreeing with Obama’s unconstitutional amnesty is an example of his fake resistance. It’s not simply the fact that Jon Boehner should be against Barack Obama’s agenda, it’s really a matter of the fact that Obama’s far-left agenda lies in direct opposition tot he Republican Party’s stated platform. Not only that, Jon Boehner campaigns as a Conservative Republican and then governs in a way that is in direct opposition to his campaign promises. Boehner had little or no chance of being elected again, so he decided to resign now, since he has to wait a year before he can become a K Street Lobbyist by law. In a year’s time, Boehner can shop himself as a former Speaker of the House to lobbying firms that want to peddle influence for hire. He would be following in the footsteps of well-known former RINO speakers like Trent Lott and Denny Hastert. It would be good timing for Boehner’s lucrative career move since it would be a couple of months before the next congress is seated in January, 2016.

Just about all Kevin McCarthy has to offer is that he is the current Republican Majority Leader, which means nothing other than he rose to power. He has no significant legislation under his belt that fits the Republican party’s platform and has a voting record that is about equal to any Democrat. Now that the members of the Establishment Republican clique are all lining up behind Kevin McCarthy, it looks like the Republican Party’s woes will continue. The Republican Party leadership will still be defying their party’s platform, ignoring their base voters, and supporting the Democrat Party agenda. With Mitch McConnell still being the RINO leader of the senate, nothing will change. Of course, Conservatives know this, so the party will still be bleeding support as it continues to frustrate those who actually believe in the party’s principles of a smaller federal government, spending controls, support of the U.S. Constitution, and a support for a strong national defense. We are realizing that we really have no reason to vote for RINOs anymore. They vote the same as the Democrats, so there is no harm in leaving our ballots blank in the sections where a RINO is running against a Democrat, because there is no difference. when Conservatives make this stand of not voting for RINOs, then the Republican Party will realize that is has very little support as far as population is concerned. They only have their big money donors and cronies as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce left. They may give lots of dollars, but they are few in voting numbers. As a result, these donors will continue to fund Democrats, as they are already doing, but in larger numbers, because, when power players want to buy politicians, they want to buy the ones who will actually win, and the RINOs won’t be able to now that their base is waking up and getting VERY PISSED OFF.

Of course, the country won’t start seeing things get better until the Democrat drones wake up from their hypnotic state of believing the Democrat Party’s lies. That, unfortunately, will not happen anytime soon. Too many people fall for the propaganda and some immediate freebies, and do not see the impending downfall of this country with the staggering amount of debt it has and the almost empty entitlement coffers it has.

It Looks Like Pope Francis Needs to Learn More About Christian Values

September 24, 2015 in Politics, Spirituality

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

Pope Francis Continues to Scold America

Pope Francis seems to think it is ok to go to another country illegally and demand that the people there hand their money over. Hoe Christian is that?

The Pope Also Could Stand to Learn a Little More About Christianity

Well, it is perfectly clear now that Pope Francis came to America to scold we the people and tell us that we need to let in more illegal immigrants, redistribute wealth from people that have more to people who have less, and tell us that we are contributing way too much to global warming. In other words, Pope Francis’ main purpose is to push his left-wing political agenda. Trouble is, his agenda isn’t that Christian. First of all, what gives Pope Franky a right to come to the country that takes in more immigrants than any other country in the world and scold this county for not taking in enough?! The Pope’s country, the Papal States has a very restrictive immigration policy, and to avoid being a hypocrite, perhaps Pope Franky should allow the United States to set its own immigration laws, seeing how we still take in more legal immigrants than any other country and have a right to turn away illegal immigrants. The illegal immigrant who goes to another country illegally and then demands that the taxpayers of the country support him or her is not acting very Christian.

The Pope scolds us for being a capitalist economy, which he says is from the devil. He also states that socialism is the best form of government for nations to have. The United States is hardly a true capitalist country anymore, now that we are employing a good deal of socialism, but to the extent that we are more capitalist than most other countries, perhaps the Pope should see how capitalism has led us to lift more people out of poverty than any other country known to man. Unless, of course, his purpose is to put more people into poverty, which socialism certainly does. Perhaps more countries around the world should be employing more capitalism so that their people wouldn’t be trying so hard to flee to the United States. It takes a pretty ignorant person to chastise the country with the economic system that all these immigrants are fleeing to rather than the countries that have economic systems that the people are fleeing from. Perhaps Pope Francis should have had a few more words for the Castro regime in Cuba, who he visited before coming here, since their people are making their own homemade boats trying to flee there and come here! Somehow this Pope finds it more logical to chastise the people of this country rather than the murderous dictators ruling Cuba!

The Pope’s “income inequality” theme is tired old left-wing rhetoric. The socialist always thinks that people who become wealthy must have done so by making other people poor. So, the Pope and the average Democrat politician in this country demand that they should be given the power to decide how much money a person can have, who gets money taken away from them, and who gets the money that is taken away from others. Leftists are always generous with other peoples’ money. I don’t think that the Roman Catholic Church became the largest owner of real estate in the world by giving away wealth. It seems to me that they seem to take in more than they give out. Perhaps they should have some of their immense wealth redistributed to other, less affluent religions. I don’t think that Pope Franky would like that. I would like to remind the Pope of the Christian teaching, “Give a man a fish and you will feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you will feed him for life.” This is a capitalist message, in that the desire is for people to be able to support themselves, rather tan just having some politician merely take money from someone who has earned it and give it to someone who hasn’t. The greedy socialists, however, is more interested in taking wealth away from those who earned it and give it to those who will vote for them and keep them in power. In addition to greed, socialism also harbors another mortal sin, envy. As the socialist goes fishing for support from those who have less, feeding their envy of those who have more than them.

Finally, the Pope is now declaring the junk science of global warming to be true. The more recent science is fast overturning the climate scientists who are delivering fraudulent computer model data in exchange for grant money from the bureaucrats in Washington. I wonder if the Pope will start burning climate scientists who disagree with the man-caused global warming fraud at the stake? The Roman Catholic Church has a pretty poor history in choosing what “science” to believe and what not to. As satellite temperature readings show that the Earth’s temperature has not been rising from 18 years, and as the effect of the sun and sun spot activity shows more indications of having a stronger affect on the planet’s temperature than carbon dioxide, I think the Roman Catholic Church is a pretty funny ally for the global warming, flat-Earth, primitives. The is even jumping on the bandwagon of those who want to eliminate air conditioning. I wonder if the Vatican is willing to give up its climate controls? I guess that the people, living in poverty around the world that the Pope’s heart bleeds for will have to continue on with running water, electricity, air conditioning, heating, and all those things that they have been hoping for. The Pope wants to go back tot he middle ages.

this Pope is nothing more than a hypocrite and a, left-wing political hack. By the way, Franky hasn’t been saying much (next to nothing) about the mass genocide of Christians throughout the Middle East. He’d rather chastise the country that people are fleeing to, rather than the regimes that are oppressing, torturing, and killing these people.

Pope Francis would rather scold America than say anything about the mass Christian genocide int he Middle East

Pope Francis The Socialist Wants to Bring Back the Dark Ages

September 22, 2015 in Politics, Spirituality

Share ThisEmail this to someoneTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookShare on Tumblr

The Catholic Church Now Has a Pope that Praises Socialism and Communism and Trashes Capitalism and the Free Market

Pope Francis The Socialist Wants to Return to the Glory Days of Catholcism, the Dark Ages

Pope Francis Has Decided to Grace the U.S. with His Presence as He Scolds Us for not Wanting to be Impoverished

There was a time, under Pope John Paul II, when the Catholic Church stood against tyranny and stood for freedom. This time is now gone as the current Pope, Pope Francis, is a strong advocate of Socialism. He made a decree from the Vatican that Socialism was the most Christian form of government and that Capitalism was a tool of the devil. While capitalism gets a bad representation from the Leftists who want Socialism, their complaints are more directly related to the practice of non-free markets, in which big business and government collude together. This is the form of socialism known as fascism, where the government does not own the means of production, but controls it through deals that it makes with the private owners. This is the system that the United States finds itself in now that we have journeyed far closer to socialism in our financial practices than we have capitalism, if we ever had a truly free market in this country. While it may be bad, fully committing to socialism, where the governments owns everything, businesses, land, homes, and the people, would still be far worse. Apparently, the Pope wants to go back to the days in which the Catholic Church and monarchies ruled Europe, and there was no enterprise, productivity, or hope for the people in society. The only hope that they had was what the Catholic Church provided, dreams of a better afterlife after the misery of a mortal life ends with death.

The Pope, like any leftist, argues that the free market allows people to become too wealthy and so many others to become poor. Let’s look at the countries who practice socialism, such as North Korea, Cuba, and the former Soviet Union. They are examples of governments in which the overwhelming majority of the people were are impoverished and the rulers, at the top, are quite rich and powerful. This is because, in such societies the people do not own their own land nor homes. The people do not get to choose what career they wish to pursue, because it is ordained by the needs of the state. People are unproductive because they do not reap any benefits for hard work, since the pay is the same for everyone, very low. It is not surprising that with the Catholic Church losing followers and losing dedication from even self-proclaimed Catholics, they would want to go back to their glory days when they were the only religion, that being the dark ages of medieval society.

The Pope attacks capitalism and the free market because people can become wealthy from it. He declares this evil on the spot, saying that the wealth should be distributed among the population equally. Who is to judge what is wealthy enough and what is too much, the Pope? If the Pope is so into distributing wealth, why doesn’t he, being the leader of the largest real estate owner in the world, the Catholic Church, distribute some of the church’s extreme amounts of wealth to lesser fortunate religions? As with all socialists, Pope Francis is a hypocrite. If the Catholic Church despises wealth so much, why don’t they return all of the big checks that are donated to them from around the world? I’m sure that Pope Franky would say tat it is because the church does such great works. And other wealthy entities or people don’t? As with all leftists, Pope Franky condemns with a broad brush.

To the extent that the United States has practiced more of the free market principles of capitalism than most other countries of the world, I guess Pope Francis is upset that people living in the U.S., even the poor, are living a higher standard of living than most of the rest of the world. Franky says that more affluent countries should give money to those countries that are less affluent. The U.S. is the biggest charitable entity in the world, but this is not good enough for Pope Franky. I guess that the Pope doesn’t like the fact that the United States has running water and sewage and septic systems throughout the land. This was a result of the capitalism that the nation did practice. Perhaps Pope Francis would like to go back to the glorious middle ages in which the people were owned by their governments and had to use outhouses, at best, for their sanitation.

During his visit to Cuba, an impoverished nation ruled by a dictator and his family, Pope Francis did not utter any words of displeasure toward the regime that keeps so many people impoverished while the cronies at the top have all of the money. Those socialist and communist countries of the world embody the evil more fully that Pope Francis attributes to capitalism, a few rich people ruling over impoverished masses. So it seems that the Pope is engaging in the same propaganda as the Democrat Party does in this country. They blast the free market and capitalism, while their own plan of choice leads to more income inequality and more poverty. Yet, probably the Pope is aware of this, and is really wants to move back to the dark ages, where we are all impoverished like good little sheep in his flock as he and the governments of the world rule over us, feeding off of our productivity for their own enrichment. This makes sense, because one can control people more easily that way, especially when they have no hope for anything, but death, when they hope they go to heaven. Just remember, 10% of all of your wealth needs to go, in the form of tithes, to Pope Franky and his Roman Catholic Church, no matter how much you have. Talk about GREED. As a catholic you need to pay the Catholic Church a 10% of your income in extortion money, or you won’t go to heaven and just might end up in hell. What a hypocritical bastard this Pope is.

Perhaps Pope Francis will declare Barack Obama Holy Roman Emperor. They have the same tyrannical designs after all.